- The following is a sequel to Why Lying and Murder are Justified in Scientology . It adds more information to expose how Hubbard twists words so some seemingly innocent ideas ultimately twist and turn into dehumanizing some people while praising others. The key is realizing WHO gets to decide which people are raised up and just how low the others are dropped down.
- The following is a sequel to Why Lying and Murder are Justified in Scientology . It adds more information to expose how Hubbard twists words so some seemingly innocent ideas ultimately twist and turn into dehumanizing some people while praising others. The key is realizing WHO gets to decide which people are raised up and just how low the others are dropped down.
A civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where Man is free to rise to greater heights, are the aims of Scientology
THE AIMS OF SCIENTOLOGY
THE AIMS OF SCIENTOLOGY
Written by Ron Hubbard in September 1965
People often don't understand what Hubbard meant here. I certainly didn't while I was in Scientology.
First off, he never had any methods to actually help improve sanity or ability, and he knew it. So his only option to remove criminals and the insane was to exterminate them en masse.
Next he talks of the able prospering and honest beings having rights. What about beings he doesn't consider honest ? He doesn't reserve ANY rights for them !
He talks of man being free to rise to greater heights - but fails to mention how such a rise could occur. Leaving man with a quite nebulous freedom indeed.
But is this all just vague philosophy with no practical applications involving anything real ? After all lots of philosophies have abstract concepts. What matters is concrete actions, particularly involving people and say governments.
In the face of danger from Govts or courts there are only two errors one can make: (a) do nothing and (b) defend. The right things to do with any threat are to (1) Find out if we want to play the offered game or not, (2) If not, to derail the offered game with a feint or attack upon the most vulnerable point. which can be disclosed in the enemy ranks, (3) Make enough threat or clamor to cause the enemy to quail, (4) Don't try to get any money out of it, (5) Make every attack by us also sell Scientology and (6) Win. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or anything or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Peace is bought with an exchange of advantage, so make the advantage and then settle. Don't ever defend. Always attack. Don't ever do nothing. Unexpected attacks in the rear of the enemy's front ranks work best
People often don't understand what Hubbard meant here. I certainly didn't while I was in Scientology.
First off, he never had any methods to actually help improve sanity or ability, and he knew it. So his only option to remove criminals and the insane was to exterminate them en masse.
Next he talks of the able prospering and honest beings having rights. What about beings he doesn't consider honest ? He doesn't reserve ANY rights for them !
He talks of man being free to rise to greater heights - but fails to mention how such a rise could occur. Leaving man with a quite nebulous freedom indeed.
But is this all just vague philosophy with no practical applications involving anything real ? After all lots of philosophies have abstract concepts. What matters is concrete actions, particularly involving people and say governments.
In the face of danger from Govts or courts there are only two errors one can make: (a) do nothing and (b) defend. The right things to do with any threat are to (1) Find out if we want to play the offered game or not, (2) If not, to derail the offered game with a feint or attack upon the most vulnerable point. which can be disclosed in the enemy ranks, (3) Make enough threat or clamor to cause the enemy to quail, (4) Don't try to get any money out of it, (5) Make every attack by us also sell Scientology and (6) Win. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or anything or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Peace is bought with an exchange of advantage, so make the advantage and then settle. Don't ever defend. Always attack. Don't ever do nothing. Unexpected attacks in the rear of the enemy's front ranks work best
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 AUGUST 1960 DEPT OF GOVT AFFAIRS Ron Hubbard
Here Hubbard specifically said if attacked to find or manufacture evidence and don't ever do nothing. Very specific and leaving no room for discretion or respecting legitimate authorities.
Here Hubbard specifically said if attacked to find or manufacture evidence and don't ever do nothing. Very specific and leaving no room for discretion or respecting legitimate authorities.
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 AUGUST 1960 DEPT OF GOVT AFFAIRS Ron Hubbard
Here Hubbard made it clear he wanted philosophies or societies to be in complete compliance with the goals of Scientology. And notably he stated there is no overt in bringing good order. In the context of his other statements in the first entry in this series it is clear anything is allowed to be done to anyone Scientology decrees low tones or suppressive persons, meaning anyone unwilling to comply with Scientology's authority. Anything including lying to or about them or murder.
“You want to know what happens when you clear everybody in that neighborhood, the only thing that [Scientology] center can become used for is a political center. Because by the time you’ve done all this, you are the government…” — Ron Hubbard. Taped Lecture – 9 January 1962: Future Org Trends.
Hubbard's goals, Scientology's ultimate goals, were totalitarian. He wanted his creation to take over the entire world and replace all governments.
“Once the world is Clear – a nation, a state, a city or a village – the Scientology-organization in the area becomes its government! And once this has taken place the only policy accepted as valid is Scientology policy.” — Ron Hubbard. Taped Lecture – 9 January 1962: Future Org Trends.
He here makes it perfectly clear that all laws of any kind, including any on human rights, are subordinate to Scientology policy - his policy, his ideas.
HONEST PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS, TOO
He here makes it perfectly clear that all laws of any kind, including any on human rights, are subordinate to Scientology policy - his policy, his ideas.
HONEST PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS, TOO
After you have achieved a high level of ability you will be the first to insist upon your rights to live with honest people.
When you know the technology of the mind, you know that it is a mistake to use “individual rights” and “freedom” as arguments to protect those who would only destroy.
Individual rights were not originated to protect criminals, but to bring freedom to honest men. Into this area of protection then dived those who needed “freedom” and “individual liberty” to cover their own questionable activities.
Freedom is for honest people. No man who is not himself honest can be free—he is his own trap. When his own deeds cannot be disclosed then he is a prisoner; he must withhold himself from his fellows and is a slave to his own conscience. Freedom must be deserved before any freedom is possible.
To protect dishonest people is to condemn them to their own hells. By making “individual rights” a synonym for “protect the criminal” one helps bring about a slave state for all; for where “individual liberty” is abused, an impatience with it arises which at length sweeps us all away. The targets of all disciplinary laws are the few who err. Such laws unfortunately also injure and restrict those who do not err. If all were honest, there would be no disciplinary threats.
By seeking to invoke his “individual rights” to protect himself from an examination of his deeds, he reduces just that much the future of individual liberty—for he himself is not free. Yet he infects others who are honest by using their right to freedom to protect himself.
Uneasy lies the head that wears a guilty conscience. And it will lie no more easily by seeking to protect misdeeds by pleas of “freedom means that you must never look at me.” The right of a person to survive is directly related to his honesty.
Freedom for Man does not mean freedom to injure Man. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to harm by lies.
Man cannot be free while there are those amongst him who are slaves to their own terrors.
To preserve that freedom, one must not permit men to hide their evil intentions under the protection of that freedom. To be free, a man must be honest with himself and with his fellows. If a man uses his own honesty to protest the unmasking of dishonesty, then that man is an enemy of his own freedom.
We can stand in the sun only so long as we do not let the deeds of others bring the darkness.
Freedom is for honest men. Individual liberty exists only for those who have the ability to be free.
Today, in Scientology, we know the jailer—the person himself. And we can restore the right to stand in the sun by eradicating the evil men do to themselves.
So do not say that an investigation of a person or the past is a step toward slavery. For, in Scientology, such a step is the first step toward freeing a man from the guilt of self.
Were it the intention of the Scientologist to punish the guilty, then and only then would a look into the past of another be wrong.
But we are not police. Our look is the first step toward unlocking the doors—for they are all barred from within.
Who would punish when he could salvage? Only a madman would break a wanted object when he could repair it—and we are not mad.
The individual must not die in this machine age—rights or no rights. The criminal and madman must not triumph with their newfound tools of destruction.
The least free person is the person who cannot reveal his own acts and who protests the revelation of the improper acts of others. On such people will be built a future political slavery where we all have numbers—and our guilt—unless we act.
It is fascinating that blackmail and punishment are the keynotes of all dark operations. What would happen if these two commodities no longer existed? What would happen if all men were free enough to speak? Then and only then would you have freedom.
On the day when we can fully trust each other, there will be peace on Earth.
Don’t stand in the road of that freedom. Be free, yourself.
Ron Hubbard
The key to understanding the above policy by Hubbard is that the entire use of the terms able and honest when used by Hubbard are arbitrary. They are code words to fool the cult members. They mean people who cooperate with Hubbard, Hubbard's policies and entirely submit to his authority. And are never a danger to Hubbard or his power. They actually are reversals of truth, but hard to understand at first. Able means unable to resist Hubbard's control and certainly unable to see his true intentions. Honest starts by meaning entirely willing to tell anything to Scientology but gradually includes only believing Hubbard's claims, even when, especially when direct observations contradict Hubbard's claims.
Hubbard's brand of honesty is self deception. The right such "honest" men earn is to think, feel and behave exactly as Hubbard demanded.
Hubbard wanted all right to personal privacy revoked for anyone, anyone except of course himself. The fact that information given under the priest penitent privilege is collected for blackmail and often the privilege is revoked to help OSA or the ethics section to investigate or ruin a person. The assurances from Hubbard are simply lies for misdirection. To throw off anyone who can spot the eradication of individual rights and render their warnings powerless.
Finally, Hubbard used a particularly pernicious trick. He said on the day when we can fully trust each other there will be peace on Earth. Well, when is there peace on Earth ? Never, in our world with billions of people in over a hundred countries sadly there is always conflict. So, by his logic we can never fully trust each other.
And if we can never fully trust each other, how much can we trust each other ? But oddly we are supposed to trust Hubbard and only Hubbard.
Hubbard even had promotional materials in his organizations that said "Build trust in yourself, become a trained auditor". So, ultimately your trust in Hubbard is meant to override and overshadow your own judgment and direct observations. Scientology is a non-reality based belief system. With complete obedience, subservience and blind faith in Scientology and Hubbard providing a foundation of lies, denial and dissociation to preserve the absolute iron clad hold Hubbard's methods place upon a mind.
He ultimately wanted the individual to see his authority as justified, any objections as sure signs of hidden evil acts by evil beings unworthy of any rights and complete surrender of rights as honest and ethical. Within a framework of seeing Scientology policy as superior to and eventually replacing all laws. But the immediate acceptance of Scientology as superior to law and from a higher authority makes violating laws entirely justified, and with no laws or Scientology policy safeguarding human rights, are there truly any left at all in Scientology? No, there is an absence of rights accompanied by an illusion, an artificially created persistent delusion, of rights. Totalitarianism disguised as enlightenment. That is Hubbard's gift to the world.
"Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not."
- Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"
The key to understanding the above policy by Hubbard is that the entire use of the terms able and honest when used by Hubbard are arbitrary. They are code words to fool the cult members. They mean people who cooperate with Hubbard, Hubbard's policies and entirely submit to his authority. And are never a danger to Hubbard or his power. They actually are reversals of truth, but hard to understand at first. Able means unable to resist Hubbard's control and certainly unable to see his true intentions. Honest starts by meaning entirely willing to tell anything to Scientology but gradually includes only believing Hubbard's claims, even when, especially when direct observations contradict Hubbard's claims.
Hubbard's brand of honesty is self deception. The right such "honest" men earn is to think, feel and behave exactly as Hubbard demanded.
Hubbard wanted all right to personal privacy revoked for anyone, anyone except of course himself. The fact that information given under the priest penitent privilege is collected for blackmail and often the privilege is revoked to help OSA or the ethics section to investigate or ruin a person. The assurances from Hubbard are simply lies for misdirection. To throw off anyone who can spot the eradication of individual rights and render their warnings powerless.
Finally, Hubbard used a particularly pernicious trick. He said on the day when we can fully trust each other there will be peace on Earth. Well, when is there peace on Earth ? Never, in our world with billions of people in over a hundred countries sadly there is always conflict. So, by his logic we can never fully trust each other.
And if we can never fully trust each other, how much can we trust each other ? But oddly we are supposed to trust Hubbard and only Hubbard.
Hubbard even had promotional materials in his organizations that said "Build trust in yourself, become a trained auditor". So, ultimately your trust in Hubbard is meant to override and overshadow your own judgment and direct observations. Scientology is a non-reality based belief system. With complete obedience, subservience and blind faith in Scientology and Hubbard providing a foundation of lies, denial and dissociation to preserve the absolute iron clad hold Hubbard's methods place upon a mind.
He ultimately wanted the individual to see his authority as justified, any objections as sure signs of hidden evil acts by evil beings unworthy of any rights and complete surrender of rights as honest and ethical. Within a framework of seeing Scientology policy as superior to and eventually replacing all laws. But the immediate acceptance of Scientology as superior to law and from a higher authority makes violating laws entirely justified, and with no laws or Scientology policy safeguarding human rights, are there truly any left at all in Scientology? No, there is an absence of rights accompanied by an illusion, an artificially created persistent delusion, of rights. Totalitarianism disguised as enlightenment. That is Hubbard's gift to the world.
"Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not."
- Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.